Ad is loading...
FPKFX vs RLBFX
FPKFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPKFX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Puritan K6
Price$14.89
Change+$0.16 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.17
Change+$0.36 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.62B
FPKFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPKFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPKFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 224B vs. FPKFX (1.98B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FPKFX: RLBFX (2.26) vs FPKFX (1.98). FPKFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FPKFX (6 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FPKFX (0.32) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FPKFX (62.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FPKFX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.19 vs. FPKFX (-1.38). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 58.39 vs. RLBFX (37.06).
| FPKFX | RLBFX | FPKFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.30 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.30 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.494 | -3.179 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 224B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.26 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.38 | 1.19 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.24 | 11.14 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.39 | 37.06 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...