Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPKFX vs RLBFX
FPKFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPKFX vs RLBFX
FPKFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPKFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPKFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FPKFX (2.35B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FPKFX: RLBFX (2.02) vs FPKFX (1.63). FPKFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FPKFX (7 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FPKFX (0.33) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FPKFX (0) vs RLBFX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.45 vs. RLBFX (17.07). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.18 vs. RLBFX (37.80).
| FPKFX | RLBFX | FPKFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.30 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.30 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.103 | 9.536 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 2.02 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.45 | 17.07 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.82 | 45.61 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.18 | 37.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement