Advertisement
FPLPF vs HTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPLPF is a Buy and HTZ is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.05% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
HTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+2.42% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| FPLPF | HTZ | FPLPF / HTZ | |
| Capitalization | 411M | 2.39B | 17% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.65B | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.103 | 95.902 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.18 | 5.53 | 238% |
| Revenue | 478M | 9.37B | 5% |
| Total Cash | 49.6M | 764M | 6% |
| Total Debt | 752M | 17.8B | 4% |
| FPLPF | HTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPSPX | 24.51 | 0.06 | +0.25% |
| NYLI Epoch Global Equity Yield Class A | |||
| FFNAX | 13.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A | |||
| RRITX | 21.88 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price International Stock R | |||
| MUXRX | 26.72 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory S&P 500 Index R | |||
| CFGIX | 19.16 | N/A | N/A |
| Cromwell Foresight Glbl Sust InfrasInstl | |||
FPLPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FPLPF and OPFI have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPLPF and OPFI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPLPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPLPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OPFI - FPLPF | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| LDI - FPLPF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| UPST - FPLPF | 5% Poorly correlated | +7.70% | ||
| HTZ - FPLPF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
| SOFI - FPLPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
More | ||||
HTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.