Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPUKX vs RLBAX
FPUKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FPUKX vs RLBAX
FPUKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPUKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPUKX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FPUKX (33.4B). FPUKX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FPUKX (1.59) vs RLBAX (1.12). FPUKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FPUKX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FPUKX (0.40). FPUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FPUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FPUKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FPUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. RLBAX (5.54). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.27 vs. FPUKX (3.77).
| FPUKX | RLBAX | FPUKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.32 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.32 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.419 | 7.533 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.4B | 285B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.12 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 5.54 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.28 | 37.88 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.77 | 27.27 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.34 | 74.22 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement