Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs HIMFX
FQCHX vs HIMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs HIMFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.06M
American High-Income Municipal Bond F3
Price$15.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.02B
FQCHX vs HIMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. HIMFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and HIMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIMFX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. FQCHX (32.1M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than HIMFX: FQCHX (5.50) vs HIMFX (4.36). FQCHX was incepted earlier than HIMFX: FQCHX (6 years) vs HIMFX (9 years). FQCHX (0.50) is less costly to investors than HIMFX (0.31). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. HIMFX (28.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMFX: FQCHX (0) vs HIMFX (1000000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. HIMFX (-0.59). FQCHX return over 5 years is better than : 5.40 vs. HIMFX (-3.11).
| FQCHX | HIMFX | FQCHX / HIMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.31 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.767 | 0.654 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1M | 13B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.50 | 4.36 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | -0.59 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.41 | 12.00 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.40 | -3.11 | -174% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |