Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs HIMFX
FQCHX vs HIMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs HIMFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.98M
American High-Income Municipal Bond F3
Price$14.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.54B
FQCHX vs HIMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. HIMFX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and HIMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FQCHX (27M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than HIMFX: FQCHX (5.54) vs HIMFX (4.36). FQCHX was incepted earlier than HIMFX: FQCHX (6 years) vs HIMFX (8 years). FQCHX (0.50) is less costly to investors than HIMFX (0.32). HIMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FQCHX (38.97). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMFX: FQCHX (0) vs HIMFX (1000000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. HIMFX (-2.65). FQCHX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. HIMFX (-6.10).
| FQCHX | HIMFX | FQCHX / HIMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.32 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.333 | -3.139 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27M | 12.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 4.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -2.65 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | -0.81 | -1,010% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.99 | -6.10 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers