Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs NHMFX
FQCHX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHMFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.98M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.77
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.25B
FQCHX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHMFX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. FQCHX (27M). NHMFX (5.67) and FQCHX (5.54) have matching dividends . FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHMFX (18.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: FQCHX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. NHMFX (-4.36). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.90 vs. FQCHX (1.99).
| FQCHX | NHMFX | FQCHX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.87 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.87 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.333 | -3.634 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27M | 13.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 5.67 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -4.36 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 3.63 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.99 | 5.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers