Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs NHMFX
FQCHX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHMFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.06M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.14B
FQCHX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHMFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. FQCHX (32.1M). NHMFX (5.60) and FQCHX (5.50) have matching dividends . FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). NHMFX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHMFX (18.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: FQCHX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). NHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. FQCHX (1.74). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.54 vs. FQCHX (5.40).
| FQCHX | NHMFX | FQCHX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.77 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.77 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.767 | 2.167 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1M | 13.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.50 | 5.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | 2.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.41 | 21.02 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.40 | 12.54 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |