Ad is loading...
FQCHX vs NHMFX
FQCHX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHMFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.44M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FQCHX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHMFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FQCHX (29.4M). NHMFX (5.45) and FQCHX (5.35) have matching dividends . FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHMFX (28.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: FQCHX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. NHMFX (3.75). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. FQCHX (13.19).
| FQCHX | NHMFX | FQCHX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.87 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.87 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.084 | -0.014 | -596% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.4M | 14.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.35 | 5.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 3.75 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | 1.33 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.19 | 23.08 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers