Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQITX vs RERAX
FQITX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FQITX vs RERAX
FQITX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQITX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQITX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FQITX (2.08B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FQITX: RERAX (2.25) vs FQITX (1.86). FQITX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FQITX (6 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FQITX (0.17). FQITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). FQITX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FQITX (0) vs RERAX (250). FQITX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. RERAX (3.67). FQITX return over 5 years is better than : 19.51 vs. RERAX (-10.37).
| FQITX | RERAX | FQITX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.602 | 1.693 | 567% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 141B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.25 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 3.67 | 376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.51 | 12.38 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.51 | -10.37 | -188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement