Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQITX vs RERAX
FQITX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FQITX vs RERAX
FQITX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQITX vs. RERAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQITX is a Hold and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FQITX (2.14B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FQITX: RERAX (2.21) vs FQITX (1.80). FQITX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FQITX (6 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FQITX (0.17). FQITX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). FQITX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FQITX (0) vs RERAX (250). FQITX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.14 vs. RERAX (2.73). FQITX return over 5 years is better than : 14.43 vs. RERAX (-9.17).
| FQITX | RERAX | FQITX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.104 | 5.861 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 140B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.14 | 2.73 | 444% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.54 | 23.54 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.43 | -9.17 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers