Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs FQNCX
FQMDX vs FQNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs FQNCX
FQMDX vs FQNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. FQNCX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and FQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQNCX has more cash in the bank: 579M vs. FQMDX (316M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than FQNCX: FQMDX (3.31) vs FQNCX (2.89). FQMDX was incepted earlier than FQNCX: FQMDX (8 years) vs FQNCX (8 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FQNCX (0.85). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. FQNCX (16.14). FQMDX (4%) and FQNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FQMDX (1000) and FQNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. FQMDX (7.00). FQMDX return over 5 years is better than : -0.44 vs. FQNCX (-0.85).
| FQMDX | FQNCX | FQMDX / FQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.85 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.85 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 1.825 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 579M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 2.89 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 7.56 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 10.74 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | -0.85 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement