Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs FTGAX
FQMDX vs FTGAX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs FTGAX
FQMDX vs FTGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. FTGAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and FTGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. FTGAX (264M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than FTGAX: FQMDX (3.31) vs FTGAX (3.11). FQMDX was incepted earlier than FTGAX: FQMDX (8 years) vs FTGAX (39 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FTGAX (0.75). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. FTGAX (10.73). FQMDX (4%) and FTGAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FQMDX (1000) and FTGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. FQMDX (7.34). FQMDX return over 5 years is better than : -0.44 vs. FTGAX (-0.72).
| FQMDX | FTGAX | FQMDX / FTGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.75 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 1.887 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 264M | 120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.11 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 7.96 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 11.17 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | -0.72 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement