Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs FTGAX
FQMDX vs FTGAX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs FTGAX
FQMDX vs FTGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. FTGAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and FTGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 306M vs. FTGAX (256M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than FTGAX: FQMDX (3.41) vs FTGAX (3.24). FQMDX was incepted earlier than FTGAX: FQMDX (8 years) vs FTGAX (39 years). FQMDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FTGAX (0.77). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. FTGAX (10.73). FQMDX (4%) and FTGAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FQMDX (1000) and FTGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. FQMDX (4.18). FQMDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.85 vs. FTGAX (-3.22).
| FQMDX | FTGAX | FQMDX / FTGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.77 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | -0.237 | 48% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 256M | 120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.24 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 4.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 10.15 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | -3.22 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement