Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs GTFBX
FQMDX vs GTFBX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs GTFBX
FQMDX vs GTFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. GTFBX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and GTFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTFBX has more cash in the bank: 565M vs. FQMDX (318M). GTFBX pays higher dividends than FQMDX: GTFBX (3.55) vs FQMDX (3.31). FQMDX was incepted earlier than GTFBX: FQMDX (8 years) vs GTFBX (33 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GTFBX (0.61). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. GTFBX (16.00). FQMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTFBX: FQMDX (1000) vs GTFBX (2500). GTFBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. FQMDX (6.81). GTFBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.94 vs. FQMDX (-0.31).
| FQMDX | GTFBX | FQMDX / GTFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.56 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.61 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.338 | 2.627 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 318M | 565M | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 7.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 13.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.31 | 5.94 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement