Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs GTFBX
FQMDX vs GTFBX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs GTFBX
FQMDX vs GTFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. GTFBX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and GTFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTFBX has more cash in the bank: 550M vs. FQMDX (306M). GTFBX pays higher dividends than FQMDX: GTFBX (3.68) vs FQMDX (3.41). FQMDX was incepted earlier than GTFBX: FQMDX (8 years) vs GTFBX (33 years). FQMDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than GTFBX (0.61). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. GTFBX (16.00). FQMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTFBX: FQMDX (1000) vs GTFBX (2500). FQMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.51 vs. GTFBX (4.28). GTFBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.79 vs. FQMDX (-2.75).
| FQMDX | GTFBX | FQMDX / GTFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.56 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.61 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.010 | -0.084 | 12% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 550M | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.68 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 4.28 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.71 | 11.64 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.75 | 2.79 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement