Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs GTFBX
FQMDX vs GTFBX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs GTFBX
FQMDX vs GTFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. GTFBX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and GTFBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTFBX has more cash in the bank: 559M vs. FQMDX (316M). GTFBX pays higher dividends than FQMDX: GTFBX (3.55) vs FQMDX (3.31). FQMDX was incepted earlier than GTFBX: FQMDX (8 years) vs GTFBX (33 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than GTFBX (0.61). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. GTFBX (16.00). FQMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTFBX: FQMDX (1000) vs GTFBX (2500). GTFBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. FQMDX (7.34). GTFBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.82 vs. FQMDX (-0.44).
| FQMDX | GTFBX | FQMDX / GTFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.56 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.61 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 2.161 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 559M | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.21 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 13.65 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 5.82 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement