Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MBMDX
FQMDX vs MBMDX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MBMDX
FQMDX vs MBMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MBMDX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MBMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 306M vs. MBMDX (160M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than MBMDX: FQMDX (3.41) vs MBMDX (2.57). FQMDX was incepted earlier than MBMDX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MBMDX (33 years). MBMDX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FQMDX (0.92). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MBMDX (9.00). FQMDX (1000) and MBMDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FQMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. MBMDX (3.19). FQMDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.85 vs. MBMDX (-3.23).
| FQMDX | MBMDX | FQMDX / MBMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.61 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | -1.224 | 9% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 160M | 191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 2.57 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 3.19 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 7.71 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | -3.23 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement