Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MCNCX
FQMDX vs MCNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MCNCX
FQMDX vs MCNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MCNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MCNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. FQMDX (318M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than MCNCX: FQMDX (3.31) vs MCNCX (2.56). FQMDX was incepted earlier than MCNCX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MCNCX (33 years). MCNCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FQMDX (0.90). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MCNCX (6.00). FQMDX (1000) and MCNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCNCX (6.81) and FQMDX (6.81) have marching annual gain over last year. MCNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.14 vs. FQMDX (-0.31).
| FQMDX | MCNCX | FQMDX / MCNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.59 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.61 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.338 | 2.187 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 318M | 578M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 2.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 6.81 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 9.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.31 | -0.14 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement