Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MFSCX
FQMDX vs MFSCX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MFSCX
FQMDX vs MFSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MFSCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MFSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. MFSCX (252M). MFSCX (3.45) and FQMDX (3.31) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MFSCX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MFSCX (42 years). MFSCX (0.91) and FQMDX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MFSCX (19.00). MFSCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX (1000) and MFSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MFSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. FQMDX (7.34). MFSCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.25 vs. FQMDX (-0.44).
| FQMDX | MFSCX | FQMDX / MFSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.84 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.91 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 2.004 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 252M | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.45 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.14 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 11.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 2.25 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement