Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MLALX
FQMDX vs MLALX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MLALX
FQMDX vs MLALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MLALX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MLALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 306M vs. MLALX (69.1M). MLALX (3.57) and FQMDX (3.41) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MLALX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MLALX (10 years). FQMDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than MLALX (0.86). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MLALX (14.00). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQMDX: MLALX (0) vs FQMDX (1000). MLALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. FQMDX (4.18). MLALX return over 5 years is better than : 0.28 vs. FQMDX (-2.85).
| FQMDX | MLALX | FQMDX / MLALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.66 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.86 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | -0.373 | 31% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 69.1M | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 4.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 11.05 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | 0.28 | -1,029% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement