Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MLALX
FQMDX vs MLALX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MLALX
FQMDX vs MLALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MLALX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MLALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. MLALX (71.5M). MLALX (3.46) and FQMDX (3.31) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MLALX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MLALX (10 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than MLALX (0.83). MLALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FQMDX (20.14). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQMDX: MLALX (0) vs FQMDX (1000). MLALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.25 vs. FQMDX (7.34). MLALX return over 5 years is better than : 3.33 vs. FQMDX (-0.44).
| FQMDX | MLALX | FQMDX / MLALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.65 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.83 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 2.012 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 71.5M | 442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.46 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 12.56 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 3.33 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement