Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MMGAX
FQMDX vs MMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MMGAX
FQMDX vs MMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 220.36M. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 134.52M to 306.21M. FQMDX holds the highest valuation in this group at 306.21M. The lowest valued company is MMGAX at 134.52M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1%. FQMDX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while MMGAX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FQMDX vs. MMGAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQMDX has more cash in the bank: 306M vs. MMGAX (135M). FQMDX (3.41) and MMGAX (3.30) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MMGAX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MMGAX (38 years). MMGAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FQMDX (0.92). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MMGAX (13.00). MMGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX (1000) and MMGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. FQMDX (4.18). MMGAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.13 vs. FQMDX (-2.85).
| FQMDX | MMGAX | FQMDX / MMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.99 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | -0.645 | 18% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 135M | 227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 4.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 9.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | -0.13 | 2,190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement