Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MSNCX
FQMDX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MSNCX
FQMDX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. FQMDX (318M). FQMDX (3.31) and MSNCX (3.29) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). FQMDX (0.90) and MSNCX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. FQMDX (6.81). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FQMDX (-0.31).
| FQMDX | MSNCX | FQMDX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.84 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.86 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.338 | 2.595 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 318M | 578M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.29 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 7.54 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.93 | 12.01 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.31 | 3.55 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement