Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MSNCX
FQMDX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MSNCX
FQMDX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 557M vs. FQMDX (306M). MSNCX (3.41) and FQMDX (3.41) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). FQMDX (0.92) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FQMDX (4.18) and MSNCX (4.10) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FQMDX (-2.85).
| FQMDX | MSNCX | FQMDX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.84 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.86 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | -0.492 | 23% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 557M | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.41 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 4.10 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 10.16 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | 0.15 | -1,892% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement