Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MSVAX
FQMDX vs MSVAX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MSVAX
FQMDX vs MSVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MSVAX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MSVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSVAX has more cash in the bank: 347M vs. FQMDX (316M). FQMDX (3.31) and MSVAX (3.23) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MSVAX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MSVAX (42 years). FQMDX (0.90) and MSVAX (0.90) have similar cost to investors . FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MSVAX (14.00). MSVAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX (1000) and MSVAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. FQMDX (7.34). MSVAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. FQMDX (-0.44).
| FQMDX | MSVAX | FQMDX / MSVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.82 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.923 | 1.734 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 316M | 347M | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.23 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 8.05 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.88 | 10.87 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.44 | 2.50 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement