Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQMDX vs MSVAX
FQMDX vs MSVAX Comparison
Open Charts FQMDX vs MSVAX
FQMDX vs MSVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQMDX vs. MSVAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQMDX is a Hold and MSVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSVAX has more cash in the bank: 334M vs. FQMDX (306M). FQMDX (3.41) and MSVAX (3.35) have matching dividends . FQMDX was incepted earlier than MSVAX: FQMDX (8 years) vs MSVAX (42 years). FQMDX (0.92) and MSVAX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. MSVAX (9.00). MSVAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX (1000) and MSVAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FQMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. MSVAX (3.76). MSVAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.57 vs. FQMDX (-2.85).
| FQMDX | MSVAX | FQMDX / MSVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.83 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | -0.790 | 15% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 334M | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.35 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 3.76 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 9.61 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | -0.57 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement