Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQNCX vs FRORX
FQNCX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FQNCX vs FRORX
FQNCX vs FRORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQNCX vs. FRORX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQNCX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 815M vs. FQNCX (579M). FRORX pays higher dividends than FQNCX: FRORX (3.51) vs FQNCX (2.89). FQNCX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FQNCX (8 years) vs FRORX (39 years). FQNCX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FRORX (0.66). FRORX (16.43) and FQNCX (16.14) have comparable annual turnover. FQNCX (4%) and FRORX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FQNCX (1000) and FRORX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRORX (7.73) and FQNCX (7.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FRORX return over 5 years is better than : -0.63 vs. FQNCX (-0.85).
| FQNCX | FRORX | FQNCX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.825 | 1.800 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 815M | 71% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.51 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 7.73 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 11.52 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.85 | -0.63 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement