Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQNCX vs MSNCX
FQNCX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQNCX vs MSNCX
Franklin NC Tax-Free Income A
Price$10.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets567.38M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.44
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.58M
FQNCX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQNCX vs. MSNCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQNCX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. MSNCX (450M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FQNCX: MSNCX (3.22) vs FQNCX (2.76). FQNCX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FQNCX (7 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) and FQNCX (0.85) have similar cost to investors . MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FQNCX (10.28). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQNCX (4%) vs FQNCX (4%). FQNCX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. FQNCX (0.05). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.56 vs. FQNCX (-6.20).
| FQNCX | MSNCX | FQNCX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.84 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.86 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.761 | -2.763 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 450M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 3.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.05 | 0.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.63 | 4.59 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.20 | 2.56 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement