Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQNCX vs MSNCX
FQNCX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQNCX vs MSNCX
FQNCX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQNCX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQNCX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQNCX (567M) and MSNCX (557M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MSNCX pays higher dividends than FQNCX: MSNCX (3.41) vs FQNCX (3.01). FQNCX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FQNCX (8 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). FQNCX (0.86) and MSNCX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . FQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQNCX (4%) vs FQNCX (4%). FQNCX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FQNCX (4.12) and MSNCX (4.10) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FQNCX (-3.30).
| FQNCX | MSNCX | FQNCX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.84 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.498 | -0.492 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 557M | 102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 3.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 4.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 10.16 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.30 | 0.15 | -2,190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement