Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs FWWMX
FQUAX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs FWWMX
FQUAX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and FWWMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FQUAX (41.4M). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs FQUAX (0.60). FQUAX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: FQUAX (21 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FQUAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: FWWMX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. FQUAX (-9.78). FWWMX (30.17) and FQUAX (29.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FQUAX | FWWMX | FQUAX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.31 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.537 | 4.506 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.78 | 2.09 | -469% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.93 | 30.23 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.65 | 30.17 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers