Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWEBX
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWEBX
FQUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. FQUAX (42.1M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWEBX (0.76) vs FQUAX (0.62). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). FQUAX (1.10) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWEBX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. FQUAX (-8.25). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.84 vs. RWEBX (24.05).
| FQUAX | RWEBX | FQUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.06 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.691 | 3.422 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.1M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.76 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.25 | 4.91 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.51 | 26.14 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.84 | 24.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.80 | 70.82 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers