Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMEX
FQUAX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMEX
FQUAX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and RWMEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FQUAX (41.1M). RWMEX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMEX (1.15) vs FQUAX (0.62). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). FQUAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWMEX (29.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMEX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. FQUAX (-7.12). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. RWMEX (25.78).
| FQUAX | RWMEX | FQUAX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.60 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.60 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.791 | 1.448 | -262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.12 | 7.77 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.43 | 29.22 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.69 | 25.78 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.87 | 79.65 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement