Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMEX
FQUAX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMEX
FQUAX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and RWMEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FQUAX (43.1M). RWMEX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMEX (1.16) vs FQUAX (0.60). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). FQUAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.61). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWMEX (32.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMEX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. FQUAX (-5.65). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.03 vs. RWMEX (27.51).
| FQUAX | RWMEX | FQUAX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.61 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.61 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.486 | 6.382 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.16 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 7.13 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.69 | 32.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.03 | 27.51 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.54 | 77.64 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers