Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$20.91
Change+$0.14 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.47M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.72
Change+$0.33 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.47B
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. FQUAX (48.5M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMFX (1.46) vs FQUAX (0.52). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FQUAX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMFX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). FQUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.88 vs. RWMFX (9.02). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 85.19 vs. RWMFX (49.85).
| FQUAX | RWMFX | FQUAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.31 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | 6.001 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.5M | 201B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.46 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 9.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.13 | 27.29 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.19 | 49.85 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.01 | 70.26 | 64% |