Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FQUAX (41.4M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FQUAX (0.60). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FQUAX (21 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FQUAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMFX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. FQUAX (-9.78). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.65 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| FQUAX | RWMFX | FQUAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.31 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.537 | 4.508 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.78 | 2.09 | -469% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.93 | 30.24 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.65 | 27.39 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.60 | 82.36 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers