Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs RWMFX
FQUAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FQUAX (43.1M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: RWMFX (1.42) vs FQUAX (0.60). FQUAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FQUAX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FQUAX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FQUAX: RWMFX (250) vs FQUAX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. FQUAX (-5.65). FQUAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.03 vs. RWMFX (29.34).
| FQUAX | RWMFX | FQUAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.31 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.31 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.486 | 6.626 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.1M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 7.53 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.69 | 34.20 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.03 | 29.34 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.54 | 80.88 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers