FRACF
Price
$1.55
Change
-$0.04 (-2.52%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
154.94M
FSUMF
Price
$12.91
Change
+$0.09 (+0.70%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
39.57B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRACF vs FSUMF

Header iconFRACF vs FSUMF Comparison
Open Charts FRACF vs FSUMFBanner chart's image
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.55
Change-$0.04 (-2.52%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization154.94M
FORTESCUE
Price$12.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.70%)
Volume$6.34K
Capitalization39.57B
FRACF vs FSUMF Comparison Chart in %
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRACF vs. FSUMF commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRACF is a Hold and FSUMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FRACF: $1.55 vs. FSUMF: $12.91)
Brand notoriety: FRACF and FSUMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRACF: 32% vs. FSUMF: 113%
Market capitalization -- FRACF: $154.94M vs. FSUMF: $39.57B
FRACF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $154.94M. FSUMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $39.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the long-term than FSUMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRACF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSUMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the short-term than FRACF.

Price Growth

FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +9.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +231.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+9.99% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($39.6B) has a higher market cap than FRACF($155M). FSUMF has higher P/E ratio than FRACF: FSUMF (11.77) vs FRACF (8.11). FSUMF YTD gains are higher at: 12.304 vs. FRACF (-9.211). FSUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.56B vs. FRACF (46.9M). FSUMF has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. FRACF (20.8M). FRACF has less debt than FSUMF: FRACF (97.3M) vs FSUMF (5.44B). FSUMF has higher revenues than FRACF: FSUMF (15.4B) vs FRACF (263M).
FRACFFSUMFFRACF / FSUMF
Capitalization155M39.6B0%
EBITDA46.9M7.56B1%
Gain YTD-9.21112.304-75%
P/E Ratio8.1111.7769%
Revenue263M15.4B2%
Total Cash20.8M4.33B0%
Total Debt97.3M5.44B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRACF vs FSUMF: Fundamental Ratings
FRACF
FSUMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3865
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
4394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRACF (68). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (100). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (94). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (49). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (20). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRACFFSUMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRIP16.000.12
+0.76%
TripAdvisor
ALV127.38-0.63
-0.49%
Autoliv
VNRX0.64N/A
-0.49%
VolitionRX Limited
RDAGU10.62-0.09
-0.84%
Republic Digital Acquisition Co
SPIR13.29-0.44
-3.20%
Spire Global

FRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRACF and SMMYY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRACF and SMMYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRACF
1D Price
Change %
FRACF100%
N/A
SMMYY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
FSUGY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
FSUMF - FRACF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
FWEDF - FRACF
8%
Poorly correlated
+6.66%
GARWF - FRACF
4%
Poorly correlated
+17.41%
More

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
+0.70%
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
TECK - FSUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More