Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRALX vs MSNCX
FRALX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRALX vs MSNCX
FRALX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRALX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRALX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 557M vs. FRALX (166M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FRALX: MSNCX (3.41) vs FRALX (3.16). FRALX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FRALX (39 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) and FRALX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . FRALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.17 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FRALX (4%) vs FRALX (4%). FRALX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRALX (4.22) and MSNCX (4.10) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FRALX (-3.07).
| FRALX | MSNCX | FRALX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.86 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.284 | -0.492 | 58% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 557M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.41 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 4.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.06 | 10.16 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.07 | 0.15 | -2,038% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.42 | 11.59 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement