Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRALX vs MSNCX
FRALX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRALX vs MSNCX
FRALX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRALX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRALX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 578M vs. FRALX (169M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FRALX: MSNCX (3.29) vs FRALX (3.05). FRALX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FRALX (39 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FRALX (0.80). FRALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.17 vs. MSNCX (6.00). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FRALX (4%) vs FRALX (4%). FRALX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. FRALX (6.96). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FRALX (-0.22).
| FRALX | MSNCX | FRALX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.84 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.86 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | 2.595 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 578M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 3.29 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 7.54 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.93 | 12.01 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.22 | 3.55 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.75 | 14.93 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement