Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs RYKAX
FRBCX vs RYKAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs RYKAX
FRBCX vs RYKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. RYKAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and RYKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 955M vs. RYKAX (8.59M). RYKAX pays higher dividends than FRBCX: RYKAX (3.51) vs FRBCX (0.79). FRBCX was incepted earlier than RYKAX: FRBCX (28 years) vs RYKAX (28 years). FRBCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RYKAX (1.68). FRBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKAX: FRBCX (1000) vs RYKAX (2500). RYKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. FRBCX (8.70). RYKAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.23 vs. FRBCX (13.08).
| FRBCX | RYKAX | FRBCX / RYKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.63 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.68 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.755 | 9.795 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 955M | 8.59M | 11,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 3.51 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 15.05 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.51 | 101.11 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.08 | 52.23 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.29 | 150.02 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers