Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SBFAX
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SBFAX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.76
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets841.41M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$30.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.87M
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 841M vs. SBFAX (117M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FRBCX (0.93) vs SBFAX (0.64). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SBFAX (1.46). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. SBFAX (1.79). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.62 vs. SBFAX (36.24).
| FRBCX | SBFAX | FRBCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.46 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.46 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.504 | 3.654 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 841M | 117M | 719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.64 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 1.79 | 388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.03 | 11.68 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.62 | 36.24 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.18 | 54.68 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement