Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SBFAX
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SBFAX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.77
Change-$0.07 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.9M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$30.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.5M
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 858M vs. SBFAX (120M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FRBCX (1.10) vs SBFAX (0.66). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than SBFAX (1.46). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. SBFAX (4.59). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.32 vs. SBFAX (39.94).
| FRBCX | SBFAX | FRBCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.46 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.46 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.442 | 5.998 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 858M | 120M | 715% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.66 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.21 | 4.59 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 8.28 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.32 | 39.94 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.37 | 62.93 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement