Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SBFAX
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SBFAX
FRBCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a StrongBuy and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 952M vs. SBFAX (95.6M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FRBCX (0.79) vs SBFAX (0.07). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FRBCX (28 years) vs SBFAX (28 years). FRBCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SBFAX (1.46). SBFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FRBCX (5.00). FRBCX (1000) and SBFAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. SBFAX (-9.74). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.99 vs. SBFAX (-12.92).
| FRBCX | SBFAX | FRBCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.46 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.46 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.675 | 4.349 | 406% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 952M | 95.6M | 996% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.07 | 1,183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | -9.74 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.60 | 9.91 | 642% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.99 | -12.92 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.08 | 43.44 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers