Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.38
Change-$0.18 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets862.59M
1919 Financial Services C
Price$26.46
Change-$0.16 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.98M
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. SFSLX (119M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (1.02) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. SFSLX (1.49). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 71.18 vs. SFSLX (33.50).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.19 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.389 | 4.066 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 119M | 725% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 1.49 | 573% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 4.03 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.18 | 33.50 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.50 | 46.89 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement