Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.76
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets841.41M
1919 Financial Services C
Price$26.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.87M
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 841M vs. SFSLX (117M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (0.93) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. SFSLX (-0.08). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.62 vs. SFSLX (28.18).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.19 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.504 | 3.049 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 841M | 117M | 719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | -0.08 | -9,187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.03 | 7.52 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.62 | 28.18 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.18 | 39.64 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement