Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.47
Change+$1.26 (+4.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets862.61M
1919 Financial Services C
Price$26.92
Change+$0.62 (+2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.3M
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and SFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. SFSLX (121M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (1.10) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (27 years). SFSLX (2.19) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. SFSLX (4.91). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 75.47 vs. SFSLX (36.43).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.19 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.19 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.051 | 5.238 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 121M | 713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 4.91 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.90 | 1.95 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.47 | 36.43 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.51 | 52.99 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement