Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 955M vs. SFSLX (95.8M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (0.79) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (28 years) vs SFSLX (28 years). SFSLX (2.20) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.96). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FRBCX (5.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. SFSLX (-10.18). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.32 vs. SFSLX (-19.22).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.20 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.20 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.044 | 4.187 | 431% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 955M | 95.8M | 997% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | -10.18 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.28 | 3.52 | 1,827% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.32 | -19.22 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.20 | 27.58 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers