Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs SFSLX
FRBCX vs SFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. SFSLX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a StrongBuy and SFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 980M vs. SFSLX (99.6M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than SFSLX: FRBCX (0.77) vs SFSLX (0.00). FRBCX was incepted earlier than SFSLX: FRBCX (27 years) vs SFSLX (28 years). SFSLX (2.20) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.96). SFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FRBCX (5.00). FRBCX (1000) and SFSLX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.47 vs. SFSLX (-8.23). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.96 vs. SFSLX (-19.26).
| FRBCX | SFSLX | FRBCX / SFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.20 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.20 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.626 | 6.655 | 325% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 99.6M | 984% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.47 | -8.23 | -249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.45 | 3.19 | 1,834% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.96 | -19.26 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.74 | 30.88 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers