Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBSX vs MVCAX
FRBSX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FRBSX vs MVCAX
FRBSX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBSX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBSX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. FRBSX (778M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FRBSX: MVCAX (1.16) vs FRBSX (0.98). FRBSX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FRBSX (36 years) vs MVCAX (25 years). MVCAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FRBSX (0.93). FRBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.72 vs. MVCAX (24.00). MVCAX (6%) and FRBSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRBSX (1000) and MVCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FRBSX (10.68). MVCAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. FRBSX (4.23).
| FRBSX | MVCAX | FRBSX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.97 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.207 | 10.210 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 778M | 17.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.16 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | 11.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 23.67 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.23 | 14.75 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.08 | 87.51 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement