FRCOF
Price
$346.90
Change
+$8.69 (+2.57%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
109.36B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
ROST
Price
$157.31
Change
-$0.15 (-0.10%)
Updated
Oct 21, 11:50 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
51.21B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRCOF vs ROST

Header iconFRCOF vs ROST Comparison
Open Charts FRCOF vs ROSTBanner chart's image
Fast Retailing
Price$346.90
Change+$8.69 (+2.57%)
Volume$1
Capitalization109.36B
Ross Stores
Price$157.31
Change-$0.15 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization51.21B
FRCOF vs ROST Comparison Chart in %
FRCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRCOF vs. ROST commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCOF is a Hold and ROST is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FRCOF: $346.90 vs. ROST: $157.45)
Brand notoriety: FRCOF and ROST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRCOF: 0% vs. ROST: 60%
Market capitalization -- FRCOF: $109.36B vs. ROST: $51.21B
FRCOF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $109.36B. ROST’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $51.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $177.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $16.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRCOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRCOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ROST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ROST is a better buy in the long-term than FRCOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRCOF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRCOF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ROST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ROST is a better buy in the short-term than FRCOF.

Price Growth

FRCOF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +6.74% price change this week, while ROST (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

ROST is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+1.66% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCOF($109B) has a higher market cap than ROST($51.2B). FRCOF has higher P/E ratio than ROST: FRCOF (36.98) vs ROST (24.99). ROST YTD gains are higher at: 5.001 vs. FRCOF (4.299). FRCOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 847B vs. ROST (3.25B). FRCOF has more cash in the bank: 1.67T vs. ROST (3.85B). ROST has less debt than FRCOF: ROST (5.07B) vs FRCOF (482B). FRCOF has higher revenues than ROST: FRCOF (3.3T) vs ROST (21.5B).
FRCOFROSTFRCOF / ROST
Capitalization109B51.2B213%
EBITDA847B3.25B26,062%
Gain YTD4.2995.00186%
P/E Ratio36.9824.99148%
Revenue3.3T21.5B15,326%
Total Cash1.67T3.85B43,384%
Total Debt482B5.07B9,511%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRCOF vs ROST: Fundamental Ratings
FRCOF
ROST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2324
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7237
SMR RATING
1..100
125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4827
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6336
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ROST's Valuation (86) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FRCOF (92) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

ROST's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCOF (72) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ROST (25) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that FRCOF’s stock grew similarly to ROST’s over the last 12 months.

ROST's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FRCOF (48) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

ROST's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FRCOF (63) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRCOFROST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ROST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXG50.440.56
+1.13%
Strive 1000 Growth ETF
TLTD89.700.64
+0.72%
FlexShares Mstar DevMks exUS FctTilt ETF
BKLN20.780.05
+0.24%
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
KHYB24.56N/A
+0.02%
KraneShares Asia Pacific Hi Inc USD ETF
LFAE116.35N/A
N/A
Stone Ridge 2048 Longevity Income ETF

FRCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCOF and FRCOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCOF and FRCOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRCOF
1D Price
Change %
FRCOF100%
N/A
FRCOY - FRCOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
DLTH - FRCOF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
ROST - FRCOF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
GAP - FRCOF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
BKE - FRCOF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More

ROST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROST has been closely correlated with BURL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROST jumps, then BURL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROST
1D Price
Change %
ROST100%
+0.73%
BURL - ROST
68%
Closely correlated
-2.65%
TJX - ROST
68%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
BOOT - ROST
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
GCO - ROST
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
ZUMZ - ROST
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
More