FRCOF
Price
$327.20
Change
+$27.32 (+9.11%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
77.46B
ROST
Price
$136.61
Change
-$2.48 (-1.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
48.83B
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRCOF vs ROST

Header iconFRCOF vs ROST Comparison
Open Charts FRCOF vs ROSTBanner chart's image
Fast Retailing
Price$327.20
Change+$27.32 (+9.11%)
Volume$47
Capitalization77.46B
Ross Stores
Price$136.61
Change-$2.48 (-1.78%)
Volume$2.68M
Capitalization48.83B
FRCOF vs ROST Comparison Chart
Loading...
ROST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRCOF vs. ROST commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCOF is a Hold and ROST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FRCOF: $327.20 vs. ROST: $136.61)
Brand notoriety: FRCOF and ROST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRCOF: 4% vs. ROST: 117%
Market capitalization -- FRCOF: $77.46B vs. ROST: $48.83B
FRCOF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $77.46B. ROST’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $48.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $119.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $13.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileROST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ROST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRCOF is a better buy in the long-term than ROST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ROST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ROST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FRCOF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +3.92% price change this week, while ROST (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -4.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ROST is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-4.02% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCOF($77.5B) has a higher market cap than ROST($48.8B). FRCOF has higher P/E ratio than ROST: FRCOF (38.31) vs ROST (26.09). FRCOF YTD gains are higher at: -1.624 vs. ROST (-9.691). FRCOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 618B vs. ROST (2.74B). ROST has less debt than FRCOF: ROST (5.78B) vs FRCOF (466B). FRCOF has higher revenues than ROST: FRCOF (2.68T) vs ROST (19.6B).
FRCOFROSTFRCOF / ROST
Capitalization77.5B48.8B159%
EBITDA618B2.74B22,571%
Gain YTD-1.624-9.69117%
P/E Ratio38.3126.09147%
Revenue2.68T19.6B13,673%
Total Cash1.4TN/A-
Total Debt466B5.78B8,062%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRCOF vs ROST: Fundamental Ratings
FRCOF
ROST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5065
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6158
SMR RATING
1..100
4723
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ROST's Valuation (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FRCOF (86) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

ROST's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FRCOF (61) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

ROST's SMR Rating (23) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FRCOF (47) in the null industry. This means that ROST’s stock grew similarly to FRCOF’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ROST (62) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that FRCOF’s stock grew similarly to ROST’s over the last 12 months.

FRCOF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as ROST (83) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that FRCOF’s stock grew similarly to ROST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ROST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STPZ53.130.04
+0.08%
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
BSCO21.12N/A
N/A
Invesco BulletShares 2024
PSCJ27.15-0.22
-0.80%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF
ONOF35.86-0.65
-1.78%
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF
CARU26.99-3.42
-11.23%
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN

FRCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCOF and FRCOY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCOF and FRCOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRCOF
1D Price
Change %
FRCOF100%
N/A
FRCOY - FRCOF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
DLTH - FRCOF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
ROST - FRCOF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
GAP - FRCOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
BKE - FRCOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
More

ROST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROST has been loosely correlated with TJX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ROST jumps, then TJX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROST
1D Price
Change %
ROST100%
-1.78%
TJX - ROST
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
BURL - ROST
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
LULU - ROST
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
BOOT - ROST
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
GAP - ROST
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
More