Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCOX vs FXNCX
FRCOX vs FXNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRCOX vs FXNCX
FRCOX vs FXNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCOX vs. FXNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCOX is a Hold and FXNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 567M vs. FRCOX (474M). FRCOX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: FRCOX (3.41) vs FXNCX (3.16). FRCOX was incepted earlier than FXNCX: FRCOX (39 years) vs FXNCX (39 years). FRCOX (0.72) and FXNCX (0.71) have similar cost to investors . FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. FRCOX (11.43). FRCOX (4%) and FXNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRCOX (1000) and FXNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. FXNCX (4.28). FRCOX return over 5 years is better than : -1.95 vs. FXNCX (-2.71).
| FRCOX | FXNCX | FRCOX / FXNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.71 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.71 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.241 | -0.399 | 60% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 567M | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | 4.28 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.28 | 9.93 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.95 | -2.71 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.84 | -1.11 | -76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement