Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCOX vs FXNCX
FRCOX vs FXNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRCOX vs FXNCX
FRCOX vs FXNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCOX vs. FXNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCOX is a Hold and FXNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 587M vs. FRCOX (487M). FRCOX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: FRCOX (3.31) vs FXNCX (3.04). FRCOX was incepted earlier than FXNCX: FRCOX (39 years) vs FXNCX (39 years). FRCOX (0.70) and FXNCX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. FRCOX (11.43). FRCOX (4%) and FXNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRCOX (1000) and FXNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRCOX (7.59) and FXNCX (7.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FRCOX return over 5 years is better than : 0.82 vs. FXNCX (0.14).
| FRCOX | FXNCX | FRCOX / FXNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.368 | 2.370 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 587M | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.04 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 7.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.66 | 11.62 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.82 | 0.14 | 603% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.14 | 1.30 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers