Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCZX vs SRCMX
FRCZX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FRCZX vs SRCMX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$11.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
Principal California Municipal A
Price$9.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets636.61M
FRCZX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCZX vs. SRCMX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCZX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. SRCMX (637M). SRCMX (3.40) and FRCZX (3.37) have matching dividends . FRCZX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FRCZX (17 years) vs SRCMX (36 years). SRCMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.57). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.90 vs. FRCZX (16.05). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: SRCMX (1000) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.92 vs. SRCMX (1.45). FRCZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.75 vs. SRCMX (0.34).
| FRCZX | SRCMX | FRCZX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.87 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.87 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.506 | 1.932 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 637M | 210% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | 1.45 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.10 | 10.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.75 | 0.34 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.39 | 21.91 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement