Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCZX vs SRCMX
FRCZX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FRCZX vs SRCMX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$11.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
Principal California Municipal A
Price$9.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.16M
FRCZX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCZX vs. SRCMX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCZX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. SRCMX (643M). SRCMX (3.38) and FRCZX (3.35) have matching dividends . FRCZX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FRCZX (17 years) vs SRCMX (36 years). SRCMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.57). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.90 vs. FRCZX (22.85). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: SRCMX (1000) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. SRCMX (2.21). FRCZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. SRCMX (1.34).
| FRCZX | SRCMX | FRCZX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.87 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.87 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.260 | 2.534 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 643M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.35 | 3.38 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.88 | 2.21 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.84 | 14.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | 1.34 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.73 | 21.62 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement