Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCZX vs SRCMX
FRCZX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FRCZX vs SRCMX
FRCZX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCZX vs. SRCMX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCZX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. SRCMX (655M). FRCZX (3.60) and SRCMX (3.55) have matching dividends . FRCZX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FRCZX (18 years) vs SRCMX (37 years). SRCMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FRCZX (0.56). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.20 vs. FRCZX (10.23). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: SRCMX (1000) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.05 vs. SRCMX (-0.36). FRCZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.34 vs. SRCMX (-4.49).
| FRCZX | SRCMX | FRCZX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.85 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.85 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.128 | -1.813 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 655M | 213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 3.55 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.05 | -0.36 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.09 | 8.21 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.34 | -4.49 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.86 | 12.48 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement