Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRDPX vs FWWMX
FRDPX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts FRDPX vs FWWMX
FRDPX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. FRDPX (27.3B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than FRDPX: FWWMX (1.40) vs FRDPX (0.69). FRDPX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: FRDPX (39 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). FRDPX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). FWWMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FRDPX (11.20). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRDPX: FWWMX (250) vs FRDPX (1000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. FRDPX (5.65). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. FRDPX (10.99).
| FRDPX | FWWMX | FRDPX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.31 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.357 | 5.572 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 214B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.65 | 8.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.17 | 33.10 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.99 | 29.47 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement