Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRGSX vs GFAFX
FRGSX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FRGSX vs GFAFX
FRGSX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGSX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGSX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FRGSX (17.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FRGSX (0.00). FRGSX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FRGSX (31 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). FRGSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FRGSX (8.28). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: GFAFX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. FRGSX (-3.98). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.72 vs. FRGSX (-17.50).
| FRGSX | GFAFX | FRGSX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.65 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.65 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.231 | 7.134 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.98 | 4.25 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.88 | 39.15 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.50 | 15.72 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.12 | 102.45 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement