Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRGSX vs RGACX
FRGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FRGSX vs RGACX
FRGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGSX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FRGSX (17.5B). FRGSX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FRGSX (31 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FRGSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FRGSX (8.28). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: RGACX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. FRGSX (-3.98). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. FRGSX (-17.50).
| FRGSX | RGACX | FRGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.93 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.93 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.231 | 6.959 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.98 | 3.68 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.88 | 37.13 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.50 | 13.46 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.12 | 97.58 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement