Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRGSX vs RGAGX
FRGSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FRGSX vs RGAGX
FRGSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGSX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FRGSX (17.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FRGSX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FRGSX (0.00). FRGSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FRGSX (31 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FRGSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FRGSX (8.28). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: RGAGX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FRGSX (-0.09). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. FRGSX (-15.40).
| FRGSX | RGAGX | FRGSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.29 | 528% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.29 | 528% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.471 | 8.887 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 12.55 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.23 | 50.34 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.40 | 20.99 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.20 | 122.10 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement