FRGT
Price
$4.02
Change
-$0.39 (-8.84%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IMMR
Price
$6.58
Change
+$0.04 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
217.8M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRGT vs IMMR

FRGT vs IMMR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRGT vs. IMMR commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGT is a Hold and IMMR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FRGT: $4.41 vs. IMMR: $6.55)
Brand notoriety: FRGT and IMMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRGT: 395% vs. IMMR: 103%
Market capitalization -- FRGT: $2.52M vs. IMMR: $216.81M
FRGT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.52M. IMMR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $216.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRGT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIMMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IMMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IMMR is a better buy in the long-term than FRGT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRGT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMMR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRGT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IMMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRGT is a better buy in the short-term than IMMR.

Price Growth

FRGT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +13.08% price change this week, while IMMR (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

IMMR is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMMR($218M) has a higher market cap than FRGT($2.33M). IMMR has higher P/E ratio than FRGT: IMMR (10.94) vs FRGT (0.01). IMMR YTD gains are higher at: -1.416 vs. FRGT (-47.500). IMMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 111M vs. FRGT (-4.22M). FRGT has less debt than IMMR: FRGT (3.26M) vs IMMR (352M). IMMR has higher revenues than FRGT: IMMR (1.7B) vs FRGT (13.3M).
FRGTIMMRFRGT / IMMR
Capitalization2.33M218M1%
EBITDA-4.22M111M-4%
Gain YTD-47.500-1.4163,354%
P/E Ratio0.0110.940%
Revenue13.3M1.7B1%
Total CashN/A13.9M-
Total Debt3.26M352M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRGT vs IMMR: Fundamental Ratings
FRGT
IMMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9981
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IMMR's Valuation (7) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FRGT (22) in the null industry. This means that IMMR’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

IMMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that IMMR’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

IMMR's SMR Rating (81) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FRGT (99) in the null industry. This means that IMMR’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

IMMR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FRGT (65) in the null industry. This means that IMMR’s stock grew similarly to FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

IMMR's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Peripherals industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRGT (100) in the null industry. This means that IMMR’s stock grew significantly faster than FRGT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRGTIMMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IMMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNR7.710.46
+6.34%
Burning Rock Biotech Limited
BBIO68.902.63
+3.97%
BridgeBio Pharma
TRC18.47-0.01
-0.05%
Tejon Ranch Co
MYSZ0.45-0.01
-2.28%
My Size
SLBT4.52-1.27
-21.93%
SL Science Holding Limited

FRGT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRGT has been closely correlated with YAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRGT jumps, then YAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRGT
1D Price
Change %
FRGT100%
+15.75%
YAAS - FRGT
81%
Closely correlated
-6.95%
FTFT - FRGT
73%
Closely correlated
-2.47%
BVC - FRGT
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.91%
XTKG - FRGT
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IMMR - FRGT
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
More

IMMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMMR has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IMMR jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMMR
1D Price
Change %
IMMR100%
-1.95%
PATH - IMMR
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CPAY - IMMR
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
DOCN - IMMR
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
AI - IMMR
44%
Loosely correlated
-5.83%
NTCT - IMMR
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More