FRHLF
Price
$9.40
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
GVLMF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
22.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHLF vs GVLMF

Header iconFRHLF vs GVLMF Comparison
Open Charts FRHLF vs GVLMFBanner chart's image
Freehold Royalties
Price$9.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$11.58K
Capitalization1.58B
Greenvale Energy
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$250
Capitalization22.66M
FRHLF vs GVLMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GVLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHLF vs. GVLMF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHLF is a Hold and GVLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHLF: $9.40 vs. GVLMF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: FRHLF and GVLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHLF: 14% vs. GVLMF: 130%
Market capitalization -- FRHLF: $1.58B vs. GVLMF: $22.66M
FRHLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.58B. GVLMF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $22.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGVLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GVLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the long-term than GVLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GVLMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GVLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GVLMF is a better buy in the short-term than FRHLF.

Price Growth

FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.27% price change this week, while GVLMF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHLF is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.42% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHLF($1.58B) has a higher market cap than GVLMF($22.7M). FRHLF YTD gains are higher at: 5.714 vs. GVLMF (-60.000). FRHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 370M vs. GVLMF (-2.53M). GVLMF has more cash in the bank: 9.85M vs. FRHLF (508K). GVLMF has less debt than FRHLF: GVLMF (288K) vs FRHLF (161M). FRHLF has higher revenues than GVLMF: FRHLF (382M) vs GVLMF (41.1K).
FRHLFGVLMFFRHLF / GVLMF
Capitalization1.58B22.7M6,974%
EBITDA370M-2.53M-14,644%
Gain YTD5.714-60.000-10%
P/E Ratio13.19N/A-
Revenue382M41.1K929,440%
Total Cash508K9.85M5%
Total Debt161M288K55,903%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHLF vs GVLMF: Fundamental Ratings
FRHLF
GVLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3992
SMR RATING
1..100
5494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5390
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRHLF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVLMF (61). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVLMF (92). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVLMF (94). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVLMF (90). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as GVLMF (100). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to GVLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHLFGVLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GVLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTYP5.30N/A
N/A
Community Bankers (PA)
BMDPF8.65N/A
N/A
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a.
BJCHY1.46N/A
N/A
Beijing Capital International Airport Co., Ltd.
SMORF1.25N/A
N/A
Smoore International Holdings Ltd.
BRQSF0.15N/A
-0.10%
Borqs Technologies, Inc.

FRHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHLF
1D Price
Change %
FRHLF100%
+0.10%
BTE - FRHLF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
CRLFF - FRHLF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
SPGYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
VET - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
TNEYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More

GVLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GVLMF and HMENF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GVLMF and HMENF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GVLMF
1D Price
Change %
GVLMF100%
N/A
HMENF - GVLMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
GEGYF - GVLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRST - GVLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUKYF - GVLMF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRHLF - GVLMF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More