Ad is loading...
FRMCX vs SSGSX
FRMCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FRMCX vs SSGSX
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val A
Price$20.76
Change-$1.03 (-4.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.1M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$38.61
Change-$1.79 (-4.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
FRMCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.42B vs. FRMCX (181M). SSGSX (0.52) and FRMCX (0.51) have matching dividends . FRMCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FRMCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FRMCX (1.19). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. FRMCX (32.63). SSGSX (6%) and FRMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FRMCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.20 vs. FRMCX (-20.89). FRMCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.53 vs. SSGSX (18.77).
| FRMCX | SSGSX | FRMCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.26 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.587 | -12.987 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 181M | 5.42B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.52 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.89 | -14.20 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.96 | -13.85 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.53 | 18.77 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.98 | 3.07 | -1,237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...