Ad is loading...
FRMCX vs SSGSX
FRMCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FRMCX vs SSGSX
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val A
Price$23.67
Change+$1.01 (+4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.02M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.25
Change+$1.48 (+3.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
FRMCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMCX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. FRMCX (188M). SSGSX (0.54) and FRMCX (0.53) have matching dividends . FRMCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FRMCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and FRMCX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . FRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.90 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX (6%) and FRMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FRMCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.07 vs. FRMCX (-18.88). SSGSX (35.33) and FRMCX (33.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FRMCX | SSGSX | FRMCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.017 | -10.037 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 5.52B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.88 | -13.07 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.56 | -9.53 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.97 | 35.33 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.27 | 6.88 | -498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...