Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRMCX vs SSGSX
FRMCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FRMCX vs SSGSX
FRMCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. FRMCX (224M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than FRMCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs FRMCX (0.36). FRMCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FRMCX (31 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). FRMCX (1.23) and SSGSX (1.23) have similar cost to investors . FRMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.36 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX (6%) and FRMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FRMCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. FRMCX (-2.78). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.55 vs. FRMCX (-19.61).
| FRMCX | SSGSX | FRMCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.23 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.23 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.563 | 15.641 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 4.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.52 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.78 | 8.91 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.86 | 12.96 | -45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.61 | -2.55 | 770% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.48 | 35.89 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement