Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where FRMEP declined for three days, in 22 of 96 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 23%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
FRMEP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FRMEP as a result. In 25 of 131 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 19%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FRMEP just turned positive on October 19, 2026. Looking at past instances where FRMEP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 10 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 20%.
FRMEP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FRMEP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 4 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 27%.
Following a +2.17% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FRMEP advanced for three days, in 11 of 113 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 10%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: FRMEP's P/B Ratio (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.262). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.074) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. FRMEP's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FRMEP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FRMEP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where OPBK declined for three days, in 179 of 283 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on OPBK as a result. In 50 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
OPBK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for OPBK entered a downward trend on November 03, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for OPBK just turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where OPBK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 21 of 36 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
OPBK moved above its 50-day moving average on November 11, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for OPBK crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Following a +2.73% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where OPBK advanced for three days, in 171 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 23 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.924) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (7.569) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.200) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.038) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.326) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly weaker than average sales and a marginally profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. OPBK’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
OPBK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FRMEP | OPBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 10% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 20% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 16% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 10% | 14 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 23% | 6 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 11% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 55% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRMEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while OPBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRMEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRMEP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while OPBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.
OPBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2027.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRMEP has been loosely correlated with VLYPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRMEP jumps, then VLYPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRMEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRMEP | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| VLYPO - FRMEP | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| ONBPO - FRMEP | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| BPOPM - FRMEP | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| OPBK - FRMEP | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| FULTP - FRMEP | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPBK has been closely correlated with FISI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OPBK jumps, then FISI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OPBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPBK | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| FISI - OPBK | 75% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| THFF - OPBK | 75% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| FMBH - OPBK | 75% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| BHB - OPBK | 75% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| FBIZ - OPBK | 74% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||