Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRMOX vs FXNCX
FRMOX vs FXNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRMOX vs FXNCX
FRMOX vs FXNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMOX vs. FXNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMOX is a Hold and FXNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRMOX has more cash in the bank: 601M vs. FXNCX (567M). FRMOX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: FRMOX (3.71) vs FXNCX (3.16). FRMOX was incepted earlier than FXNCX: FRMOX (39 years) vs FXNCX (39 years). FXNCX (0.71) and FRMOX (0.69) have similar cost to investors . FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. FRMOX (12.36). FRMOX (4%) and FXNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRMOX (1000) and FXNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. FXNCX (4.59). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. FRMOX (-3.19).
| FRMOX | FXNCX | FRMOX / FXNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.71 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.285 | -0.399 | 71% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 567M | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 3.16 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 4.59 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.42 | 9.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.19 | -2.71 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.08 | -1.03 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers