Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRMOX vs FXNCX
FRMOX vs FXNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRMOX vs FXNCX
FRMOX vs FXNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMOX vs. FXNCX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMOX is a Hold and FXNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRMOX has more cash in the bank: 630M vs. FXNCX (578M). FRMOX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: FRMOX (3.59) vs FXNCX (3.04). FRMOX was incepted earlier than FXNCX: FRMOX (39 years) vs FXNCX (39 years). FXNCX (0.70) and FRMOX (0.67) have similar cost to investors . FXNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.14 vs. FRMOX (12.36). FRMOX (4%) and FXNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRMOX (1000) and FXNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. FXNCX (8.14). FXNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. FRMOX (-0.41).
| FRMOX | FXNCX | FRMOX / FXNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.70 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.70 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.105 | 1.984 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 630M | 578M | 109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.04 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 8.14 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.38 | 11.46 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.41 | -0.07 | 624% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.16 | 2.10 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers