Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRMTX vs MSNCX
FRMTX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRMTX vs MSNCX
FRMTX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMTX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMTX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRMTX has more cash in the bank: 672M vs. MSNCX (578M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FRMTX: MSNCX (3.29) vs FRMTX (2.75). FRMTX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FRMTX (31 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). FRMTX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). FRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.13 vs. MSNCX (6.00). FRMTX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. FRMTX (6.16). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.55 vs. FRMTX (-2.86).
| FRMTX | MSNCX | FRMTX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.84 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.86 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.034 | 2.595 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 578M | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 3.29 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 7.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.48 | 12.01 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.86 | 3.55 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.07 | 14.93 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement