Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRMTX vs MSNCX
FRMTX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRMTX vs MSNCX
FRMTX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMTX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMTX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRMTX has more cash in the bank: 650M vs. MSNCX (557M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FRMTX: MSNCX (3.41) vs FRMTX (2.83). FRMTX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FRMTX (31 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). FRMTX (1.24) is less costly to investors than MSNCX (0.86). FRMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.13 vs. MSNCX (6.00). FRMTX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. FRMTX (3.73). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FRMTX (-5.28).
| FRMTX | MSNCX | FRMTX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.84 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.86 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.397 | -0.492 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 650M | 557M | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 3.41 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 4.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 10.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.28 | 0.15 | -3,506% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.13 | 11.59 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers