Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs GRHAX
FRNRX vs GRHAX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs GRHAX
FRNRX vs GRHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. GRHAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and GRHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRHAX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. FRNRX (510M). GRHAX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: GRHAX (2.78) vs FRNRX (1.38). FRNRX was incepted earlier than GRHAX: FRNRX (31 years) vs GRHAX (9 years). GRHAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). GRHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRHAX: FRNRX (1000) vs GRHAX (3000). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.35 vs. GRHAX (40.00). GRHAX return over 5 years is better than : 141.98 vs. FRNRX (113.80).
| FRNRX | GRHAX | FRNRX / GRHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.28 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.52 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.985 | 6.873 | 262% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 994M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 2.78 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.35 | 40.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.65 | 97.30 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.80 | 141.98 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.80 | N/A | - |