Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs ICBAX
FRNRX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs ICBAX
FRNRX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. ICBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 555M vs. ICBAX (142M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FRNRX (1.42) vs ICBAX (0.71). FRNRX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FRNRX (31 years) vs ICBAX (16 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX (1000) and ICBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. ICBAX (29.94). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 174.73 vs. ICBAX (47.54).
| FRNRX | ICBAX | FRNRX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.56 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.56 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.426 | 26.951 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 142M | 391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.71 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.14 | 29.94 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.22 | 34.46 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.73 | 47.54 | 368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.19 | 89.57 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement