Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs ICBAX
FRNRX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs ICBAX
FRNRX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. ICBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 555M vs. ICBAX (139M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FRNRX (1.30) vs ICBAX (0.68). FRNRX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FRNRX (31 years) vs ICBAX (16 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (0.97). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.00 vs. FRNRX (27.09). FRNRX (1000) and ICBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.16 vs. ICBAX (19.89). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 157.66 vs. ICBAX (44.88).
| FRNRX | ICBAX | FRNRX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.483 | 25.604 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 139M | 399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.68 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.16 | 19.89 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.82 | 33.81 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.66 | 44.88 | 351% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.74 | 97.13 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement