Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs ICBAX
FRNRX vs ICBAX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs ICBAX
FRNRX vs ICBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. ICBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and ICBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 510M vs. ICBAX (134M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than ICBAX: FRNRX (1.38) vs ICBAX (0.72). FRNRX was incepted earlier than ICBAX: FRNRX (31 years) vs ICBAX (16 years). ICBAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). ICBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX (1000) and ICBAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.35 vs. ICBAX (31.62). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.80 vs. ICBAX (28.79).
| FRNRX | ICBAX | FRNRX / ICBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.56 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.56 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.985 | 17.687 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 134M | 381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.72 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.35 | 31.62 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.65 | 31.04 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.80 | 28.79 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.80 | 87.59 | 108% |